amsnet

1 As DeepSeek Upends the aI Industry, one Group is Urging Australia to Embrace The Opportunity

One Australian company has actually discouraged personnel from the innovation, others are rushing for advice on its cybersecurity ramifications - while federal government ministers are advising care.

But others have actually welcomed DeepSeek's arrival, requiring Australia to follow China's lead in establishing effective yet less energy-intensive AI technology.

In the days since the Chinese business released its R1 synthetic intelligence design and openly launched its chatbot and app, it has overthrown the AI industry.

- Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email

Several international industry leaders saw their market values drop after the launch, as DeepSeek showed AI could be developed using a fraction of the cost and processing required to train designs such as ChatGPT or Meta's Llama.

Its arrival may signify a new market shift, but for federal government and company, the result is uncertain. Whereas ChatGPT's 2022 arrival caught governments and organizations by surprise as staff started to check out the brand-new AI innovation, a minimum of for the arrival of Deepseek, some had a playbook.

Business as typical

A representative for Telstra said the company had "a rigorous procedure to evaluate all AI tools, abilities, and use cases in our company", including a list of approved generative AI tools, and standards on how to use them.

For now at Telstra, DeepSeek is not approved and its use is not motivated (although it's not officially obstructed).

"Our favored partner is MS Copilot, and we're rolling out 21,000 Copilot for Microsoft 365 licences to our employees."

Other business sought immediate advice on whether DeepSeek need to be adopted.

Major Australian cybersecurity firm CyberCX's executive director of cyber intelligence, Katherine Mansted, stated customers had already approached the company for suggestions on whether the innovation was safe.

"That's no surprise, due to the fact that it appears the entire world has remained in a little bit of a DeepSeek craze - both the financially and market inclined and those with the security lens," Mansted said.

DeepSeek and federal government

CyberCX this week took the unusual step of quickly providing guidance suggesting organisations, consisting of government departments and those saving delicate info, sciencewiki.science highly think about limiting access to DeepSeek on work gadgets.

"We know that there is no proactive policy here from federal government ... We have actually been down this road previously," Mansted said. "We've had debates about TikTok, about Chinese surveillance cameras, about Huawei in the telco network, and we constantly act after the truth, not before the reality ... Here, especially because the hazards are around compromise of sensitive details, in terms of any info that you take into this AI assistant: it's going straight to China.

"We believed we needed to act much faster this time."

Under federal AI policy carried out in September 2024, firms have till completion of February 2025 to release transparency files about their usage of AI.

But understanding who makes decisions on the specific usage of DeepSeek in the federal government has proved tricky. The attorney general's department, which made the decision to prohibit TikTok use on federal government gadgets, referred inquiries to the Digital Transformation Agency, which in turn referred enquires to the Department of Home Affairs.

Home Affairs was asked on Thursday for its official policy and did not supply an action by the time of publication.

Familiar disputes ...

Some of the response in Australia to DeepSeek is by now familiar. There have actually been calls to prohibit the technology, amid concern over how the Chinese government may access user data - an echo of the days Huawei was banned from the NBN and 5G rollouts in Australia, and more just recently, of the dispute over banning TikTok.

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute, a strong critic of the China government, said this week that Australia "can not continue the existing approach of reacting to each new tech development". It required a tech method covering AI that included investing in sovereign AI capabilities.

The market minister, Ed Husic, said on Tuesday it was too early to decide on whether DeepSeek was a security threat.

Sign up to Breaking News Australia

Get the most essential news as it breaks

"If there is anything that presents a danger in the national interest, we will constantly keep an open mind and see what occurs. I believe it's too early to leap to conclusions on that," he stated. "But, once again, if we need to act, then responsible governments do."

He worried that Australia is "in the lasts" of preparing its action and would develop its own regulative settings.

"The US is flagging their method. The EU has theirs. Canada also will have a different method. And our local partners as well are looking at this," he stated.